Decision type: Non-key
Decision status: Recommendations Approved
Wards affected: Penhill & Upper Stratton;
Notice of proposed decision first published: 23/04/2020
Anticipated restriction: Fully exempt - View reasons
Explanation of anticipated restriction:
Business affairs.
The draft proposals for redevelopment of the site, less any commercially sensitive information, will form part of a subsequent report to the Planning Committee.
Open/Exempt: Exempt;
Decision due: 30 April 2020 by Deputy Leader of the Council and Cabinet Member for Commercialisation, Education and Skills
Lead member: Deputy Leader of the Council and Cabinet Member for Commercialisation, Education and Skills
Lead director: Head of Property Assets
Contact: Kathy Sherratt Kathy Sherratt, 07789651922, Email: ksherratt@swindon.gov.uk Email: ksherratt@swindon.gov.uk Tel: 077 8965 1922.
Consultation process
Councillor Grant provided the following comments on this proposal:
“I should like to register my disappointment that the Council has chosen to ignore the views of local residents on this matter. One is tempted to ask what is the point of consulting with residents when the decision made, of all the options before them, is the one residents least favoured. In light of this can I ask for long it is intended to keep this matter “private and confidential “? This land currently belongs to the people of Swindon surely they have a right to know as soon as possible that sometime in the near future they will no longer own it.”
Councillor Pajak provided the following comments on this proposal: “I am supportive of marketing the site which never achieved its hoped for usage levels. This is similar to another site, which was due to selecting a poor location not selected for how it would perform but rather availability and costing. The ideal site never happened due to economics and timings. My only concern with the site is the highways implications of this amazingly busy junction which must be agreed before the development.
Councillor Crilly provided comments on this proposal: Concerns regarding Traffic/Access to the Site
I am concerned about the increased traffic going directly on to the main road from this site. The preferred option would be of traffic going into and out of the site would be wholly or partially via a different route.
If traffic is to access the site via the main road, then there would need to be lights at the entrance in otherwise it will be difficult and dangerous.
The different options
Feedback from residents in the area have mainly expressed disappointment that of the site is not going to re-open, especially considering the ongoing problems with large amounts of traffic and delays along the main road. Other feedback I have received indicates that a Drive-through coffee or MacDonald’s wouldn’t be particular popular with residents.
Councillor Dempsey - No Comment received
Councillor Ibitoye provided the following comments on the proposal: Whilst I understand that the site was underused, I do think that any future proposed development must offer commensurate benefits to the local community. We need either local jobs for local people or a mix of well-designed, low carbon housing (or a combination of both). I will reserve further judgement for any ensuing planning application and will seek resident’s specific views as and when an application is submitted.
Portfolio Holder / Cabinet Member: Councillor Russell Holland, Deputy Leader of the Council Cabinet Member for Finance, Education, and Skills
Shadow / Group Spokespersons: Councillor Jim Grant (Opposition Group) Councillor Stan Pajak (Minority Group) Councillors Crilly, Dempsey, and Ibitoye
Date of Notice: Date of Notice: 22nd April 2020
©2012 Swindon Borough Council. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions